Translation Agency

Lost? Search this site or the web. Web RGBarts.org

continued from Second Page...

Relating to the theory of Dr. Lillian Schwartz, a computer whiz authority in graphics and arts that raised no contention in her lines of expertise and applications of innovative techniques, bringing about conclusions that “Mona Lisa” is a self-portrait of Leonardo da Vinci; the remarkably perfect measurements of each other’s pictures, those of the face of the painter with that of the paint-subject in the frame coincide to a perfect balanced-match-effect when it were run in the computer systems. 

What idea transpired in da Vinci's mind in creating a piece of art posing indistinctly, a subject that might have been himself, or someone else, and in no point doesn't merit any definitive answer?  Could it be that Dr. Lillian Schwartz in her computerized graphic arts experimental research revealed the truth about the genre of the da Vinci's subject?  There are indefinite opinions to consider and work about leading to contestable observations; though however, the computer graphic arts wizard, Dr. Lillian Schwartz, in release of her test results and theories may not garner from a general public's pro full support view point for reasons that handling or applications of Microsoft programs may yet prove at times to be exceptionally fallible just like anyone's common insight; and besides, who would ever know hidden concepts of an art-message from the subconscious self to a point of obscurity?  That's absurd.  Any artist keeps inner secrets, and suppressed feelings seeking outlets thru expressions in arts to release negative psychological imprints can't reliably, or bluntly relay it orally to anyone.  He alone could read his "art lines" and anybody who dares it; seeking meanings, ends up to hypothetical conclusions.

Art piece or any related material defines a part of the artist's personality; and could fixed-set ideas his mind creates depending on inspirational mode of conduct, character, psyche, and environmental aspects that affect the painter at the moment he sits down to create his art piece.  It took much difference to the Mona Lisa painting that raised worldwide further analysis as to the overwhelming success of the painting’s general acceptability over time, transformed into classic collectible piece of art, surmounting in value of detailed subtlety, rarity, and fineness of touch.

The Mona Lisa Painting is presenting a kind of myth to all peoples around the world.  It's paving ways to kind of manipulative image-quest-interest to thousands of modern day art-conscious individuals and observers to analyze and experiment various ways and means, to decipher the maze-like puzzle underlying the real meaning hidden behind a diversified point of Leonardo da Vinci's brain hemisphere; when he laid hands to paint in that canvas, the painting he never thought nor aimed, it would be risen to immortalized levels of admiration, popularity, and acceptance among the many traditional paintings. 

The mystery of the faint “smile” alone has become a legend infinite in nature, and the search for a meaning behind it is seemingly ethereal lying behind everybody’s endless thinking.
                       
 It opened various concerns of study for the famous artist’s end; why, what, for whom the relevance of that mystic smile’s deeper meaning made essence; while subject posed for de Vinci, personified by the live model during the renaissance days, unthinkable as it seemed; one day, it be would be one of the most captivating paintings in canvas.  Such absolute success in impact to general acceptability knows no bounds as to peoples’ class and lifestyle; notwithstanding, that from the time the painting was created, it never as yet raised any possibilities to uncover the reality behind; how was it, what about, and who really posed for the painting.

-o0o-

>> Go to Page 4 of Article>>